The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible.

- Albert Einstein
16
May
New super-laser has output of Petawatts (that’s a LOT of zero’s), fusion getting closer?

petawatt laser rochester universityWho doesn’t love lasers? You can be annoying at the movies with it, attach them to the heads of sharks and obtain fusion with it. Sadly it seems that the scientists over at Rochester University are only interested in the last prospect, but it’s still pretty neat.

According to a press-release from the University of Rochester, they now have a laser capable of focusing a petawatt of power, onto a target only a millimeter wide. Now the prefix Peta isn’t something we get to use often, as it’s a HUGE number, we’re not even close to measuring harddrives in that range yet, we’re barely up to terabytes there,, but Peta(bytes) comes right after that. So that’s 1.000.000.000.000.000 Watts of power output. In comparison, a normal red laser pointer typically has the power output on the order of milli-watts (0.001 Watts).

Now for me, just being able to throw those numbers around would be reason enough to build the laser, but it’s actually got practical use. It’s purpose is to try out a new concept known as fast-igntion fusion, that offers much more energy efficient way of obtaining fusion. Fusion has long been a holy-grail of sorts in the energy sector, as it would create no enviromently unfriendly gases, and much less radioactive waste compared to nuclear reactors (that work on using the concept of Fission (splitting atoms)). Although fusion has been done before, it has never been done in a way where you actually get more energy out then you put in (correct me if i’m wrong), and the fast-ignition scheme of achieving fusion is one suggestion to make it more economically viable.

Here’s a short article on fusion, explaining both the shortcomings of traditional fusion, and how the fast-ignition scheme might improve it.

2 Responses to “New super-laser has output of Petawatts (that’s a LOT of zero’s), fusion getting closer?”

  1. Thanny Says:

    I’m reasonably sure there have been fusion reactors with positive efficiencies. I recall reading, years ago, that the one at Princeton was able to achieve such.

    But it’s always been a small net output that came at a gigantic cost, and wouldn’t necessarily scale up.

  2. Kari Says:

    Hmm ok, you might be right. I couldn’t remember any (and i’m sure it would’ve been big use). I didn’t use the greatest source to double-check before posting (wikipedia), but they seemed to suggest that the biggest achieved so far was 65% of input power, but that there was one in production now that was aiming at getting a net-positive energy.

    But like i said, wikipedia isn’t exactly 100% reliable.

Leave a Reply

CAPTCHA image